Cheshire needs your help

PICKLES CHANGES THE GOALPOSTS

Cheshire East have stated they have demonstrated a ‘five year housing’ supply which defends the countryside against unwanted development, but a number of developers have been challenging this in planning appeals around the county saying Cheshire East have used the wrong methodology.

Basically stating any shortfall in housing has to be provided within the first 5 years of the Local Plan rather than the method Cheshire East have used to allow any shortfall to be spread over the full period of the Local Plan.

Unfortunately Eric Pickles has ruled in favour of the developers. 

So now Cheshire East are deemed not to be able to demonstrate a ‘five year housing’ supply, which could open the door for developers to build anywhere in Cheshire East that can be shown to be a ‘sustainable development’.   This is also not helped by the fact that the Local Plan is not yet in place.

Whilst Goostrey does not meet all the accepted requirement for  ‘sustainable development’, it might encourage more speculative planning applications.

We are not opposed to development of the village, the quoted 30-50 houses in the next 18 years would seem sensible.  However to protect Goostrey (and other villages) around Cheshire East from further unwanted development then we need to give Councillor Michael Jones at Cheshire East our support.

Read the Crewe Chronicle article , and listen to him on Radio Stoke.

What you can do:-

Please write/email Fiona Bruce MP and ask for her support for Councillor Michael Jones’s argument, that in fact Cheshire East does have a valid ‘five year housing supply’ in accordance with the ‘Liverpool’ methodology which is a valid defence under the new planning guidelines against unwanted development.
An example email………… [to  fiona.bruce.mp@Parliament.uk ] …….
Dear Fiona,
Following the recent article in the Crewe Chronicle dated 19th October,  I am writing to ask for your support for Councillor Michael Jones’s argument that the ‘Livepool’ methodology for calculation of a ‘five year housing supply’ is valid and in accordance with new planning regulations and therefore provides protection of Cheshire East from unwanted development.
I want an increase in housing in accordance with a Local Plan which puts development on brownfield land ahead of building on open countryside and green belt land wherever possible.  I don’t want an increase in housing led only by developers profits.
Yours sincerely,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s