Old Vicarage (Fairfields) extension proposal

Following the withdrawal of plans to replace the ex-Vicarage on Blackden Lane a new proposal for extending the existing house, to be known as Fairfields, has been submitted to Cheshire East earlier this month.

Link to application 19/0127C  (final date for comments 5th Feb, although no consulates/neighbours are listed to be notified on the application, which is applied for under Permitted Development as an extension rather than full planning).  The secondary building is for a single storey swimming pool.

Fairfields proposal

Fairfields house

.

Mill Bank Farm Grade ll barn urgent repairs

The Grade ll listed 17th century barn at Mill Bank Farm, off Mill Lane, is currently unsafe and in urgent need of repair/conservation “to safeguard the future of the building”.  It would certainly be sad to see such a barn go to rack and ruin.

Cheshire East are seeking planning permission for Listed Building Consent for external urgent repairs to the timber framed barn and the 19th century neighbouring building. (To include removal of existing modern blockwork pens to the interior and additional structural bracing to stabilise the structure.)

link to application 18/6211C

Mill Bank Grade ll barn

Cheshire East Council’s conservation officers have undertaken emergency repairs over the past two years and the 17th century barn is not currently in use as it is deemed unsafe.

Purcell’s Elgan Jones’ Condition report states, “The building has suffered from weathering and general degradation of exposed timbers, which has caused longstanding movement, distortion and damage to parts of the aged timber frame and original fabric.  There is other recent damage, with a small local collapse occurring in early summer 2017 to the front middle section.  This has necessitated emergency propping and some shoring up of the load-bearing frame stable to make the building safe and reasonably secure for the time being.”

 

Historic England’s listing:

“Barn late C17 with early C19 alterations and additions. Brick nogged timber frame and brickwork with slate and tile roofs. 3 truss bays with 2 bay, 2 storey brick addition (west). The framing of the barn, which stands on a 900mm high plinth of C17 bricks, is 15 panels long and-4 panels wide of small framing filled with early C19 brick nogging. There are half-heck doors and square pitch hole doors. This section of the building has the slate roof. The early C19 brick addition has a flight of brick external steps, with stone treads, which lead to the loft, also a tile roof with blue clay ridge tiles. Interior: Oak Queen Post Trusses, with high collars, are supported by jowled posts. There are oak purlins with wind braces and an oak ridge tree. Braces from the posts to the tie beams are missing. The floor and roof timbers in the C19 addition conform to the period of the building.”

Planning decisions due this week.

*updated dates.

Two planning decisions are due this week*, both by delegated authority rather than committee:

A ‘glamping’ site for 10 ‘pods’ on Bomish Lane:  18/5000m  due 1st Feb 2019.

Nine extra park homes on Mount Pleasant    :  18/4510C  due 18th January 2019.

18/4980C:  12 homes on land to the east of Hermitage Lane, with access off Nether Lea – decision due next month; 18th Feb 2019)

All have been opposed by the Parish Council and Jodrell Bank Observatory.

Click the links above for details.

Sand Quarry approved by Cheshire West

Plans for the Sibelco sand quarry on land at Rudheath Lodge, New Platt Lane were approved today by Cheshire West & Chester. The proposal had previously been approved on April 4th by Cheshire East’s strategic planning board.   (new info from the Environment Agency wasn’t discussed at the meeting but if the EA change their original ‘no objection’ then it will be referred back to planning).

Cheshire East are to meet again to review the new documents but it seems doubtful that they are allowed to alter their original vote.

and 17/03104/MIN Cheshire West and Chester)

Amongst others Goostrey’s Cllr Ken Morris spoke against the application over concerns about fugitive silica dust as well as pointing out that the stated Condition by Jodrell Bank Observatory for the site to not exceed the ITU threshold cannot possibly be enforced.  Especially when Sibelco say the site already exceeds it (before driver’s mobiles etc).  JBO have been given a draft scheme by Sibelco and will have to sign off on it before plans can go ahead.

In regard to water levels of nearby New Platt Mere dropping; CWaC stated that work would stop if water levels dropped to a certain level, and only resume once they had risen again.

Sand Quarry 8th Jan

Decision date 8th Jan

 

Sand Quarry comments extended due to new documents

Although CEC’s Strategic Planning Board voted earlier this year to approve the part of Sibelco’s planning application which is in Cheshire East, the decision has not yet been confirmed and an approval letter has not yet been issued. Residents now have the opportunity to submit further comments due to additional information, see below, up  until the 3rd January 2019. (Original comments are still relevant)

The application has not yet been considered by Cheshire West and now new objections have been raised by Garnett Farms.  They put the case that the water table in the area will be lowered if the Quarry goes ahead; in particular the water level in New Platt Mere would drop.  This has resulted in a number of new technical documents between the Environment Agency, Sibelco and others – which can be found on the following link to Cheshire West website under 17/03104/MIN. 

The Sibelco rebuttals (but not the other documents) have appeared on the Cheshire East planning website in the last few days and are open to public consultation with a closing date of 3rd January 2019, the planning application number is 17/3605W.   (click link).

After a number of re-schedulings the latest date for the Cheshire West Planning Committee is 8th January 2019.

Interestingly Cheshire West have also published a document from Sibelco entitled ‘Electromagnetic Compatibility Scheme’  which shows that the background level of radio emissions are higher than those specified by JBO, even before any works are started.  Although Sibelco have asked for a response from JBO, there is nothing showing on either CEC or CW&C websites.

Quarry location

Location of sand quarry

Jodrell oppose Glamping Site

JBO has opposed the current proposal that includes 10 ‘glamping’ pods, noting “that the impact from the additional potential contribution to the existing level of interference coming from that direction will be moderate to severe”  …..”the pods themselves are likely to offer less shielding than conventional building materials and this site is very close to the telescope”.

Goostrey Parish Council have also objected to the scheme due to conflict with N’hood Plan policies and the lack of footpaths/pavements from the site along the narrow lanes to the village.  Highways have pointed to the lack of car parking spaces on illustrations.

link to application:  18/5000m   Comments by 14th November.

The application, for Mr Barber of Cheshire Country Holidays on Bridge Lane, includes the construction of 10 glamping pods – on wheels covered by decking- a permanent reception/office, store, shop and shower block with parking spaces for 15 vehicles.

Glamping location relative to JBO & village

Housing at The Grange refused

Outline planning has been refused for 8 houses on the site of The Grange stables and menage off Station Road.  Goostrey PC voted to object and Jodrell Bank Observatory had strongly opposed the proposal.

Link to application: 18/4079C

The reasons for refusal are as follows:

  1. The Local Planning Authority considers that the proposed development would introduce a suburban, residential development (by virtue of the scale massing layout of the proposed dwellings) in this rural area which would not preserve or enhance the character of the locality. It is considered that a residential scheme in this location would not be acceptable in terms of its landscape and visual impact and would lead to an unacceptable form of development within the Open Countryside
  2. The proposed development would impair the efficiency of the Jodrell Bank Radio Telescope which is an internationally important scientific facility.

The planning officer made the following observations:

“In any event it is not considered that the fundamental principle of the replacement of the existing buildings with two storey dwellings (as proposed) would preserve or enhance the character of the area and that the proposed development would have a significant negative impact on the Open Countryside and area. The existing equine use is considered to be appropriate to the character of the area and it is considered that the form/layout of the proposed residential development would assist to erode the landscape character of the area”

“Given the local character of the area, the impact on the landscape and the impact on Jodrell Bank it is not considered that the redevelopment of the application site to a residential use represents sustainable development as detailed within this report.”  Link to full officer’s report.

Grange site refused for 8 houses